<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="book-review" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="elibrary">75447</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Technology and Language</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>Технологии в инфосфере</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2712-9934 18+</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">17</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48417/technolang.2026.03.17</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Technology as Creativity: A Review of Anna Demina and Alexander Nesterov‘s Semiotic Theory of Creativity</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>Техника как творчество: Рецензия на книгу А.И. Деминой и А.Ю. Нестерова “Семиотическая теория творчества”</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-9002-5604</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Chistanov</surname>
            <given-names>Marat</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-1347-7302</contrib-id>
          <name>
            <surname>Chistanova</surname>
            <given-names>Svetlana</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science</aff>
      <aff id="aff2">Novosibirsk State Technical University</aff>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-09-30">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <issue-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">24</issue-id>
      <fpage>286</fpage>
      <lpage>294</lpage>
      <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://soctech.spbstu.ru/userfiles/files/articles/2026/3/286-294.pdf"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>The philosophy of technology has long suffered from a consequentialist bias, focusing on the effects and risks of technology rather than on its essence. Technical creativity, in particular, remains underexplored compared to artistic creativity, often being reduced to applied science or accidental invention. This review examines the monograph Semiotic Theory of Creativity: The Problem of the New in Technology and Art by Anna Demina and Alexander Nesterov which attempts to construct a universal theoretical model of creativity applicable to both technical and artistic domains. The authors of the monograph synthesize the three-act theory of technical creativity by Pyotr Engelmeyer, the concept of form-giving forces by Friedrich Dessauer, and the ontological model of general semiotics (Frege, Peirce, Morris). They correlate the three dimensions of semiosis (pragmatics, syntactics, semantics) with the three levels of cognition (sensory perception, understanding, reason) and introduce a fourth dimension related to the material expression of signs. The reviewed book offers a systematic analysis of the epistemological problems of creativity. It defines creativity as a process of novelty generation through the transformation of pragmatic, semantic, or syntactic rules of semiosis, resulting in new objects at the level of sensory perception, new things at the level of understanding, and new ideas at the level of reason. The authors identify nine possible ways of novelty emergence in technical and artistic creativity, using science fiction as illustrative material. The monograph represents a significant contribution to the philosophy of technology, breaking with both existentialist alarmism and Marxist reductionism. While the choice of science fiction as empirical material may be debatable, and some parts of the text serve a ritual rather than analytical function, the work provides a much-needed, operationalizable framework for understanding technical creativity. It is a substantial, necessary, and important publication that opens new directions for research.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Technical creativity</kwd>
        <kwd>Semiotics of technology</kwd>
        <kwd>Problem of novelty</kwd>
        <kwd>Philosophy of technology</kwd>
        <kwd>Semiotics of art</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
